PDA

View Full Version : Hap's 1,750 Post Type Thread

Haphazard
10-09-2008, 09:36 PM
I figure that 1,750 posts is enough for everyone to have gotten to know me.

If there are any disagreements as to my type, post with your argument. I'm in the mood for a good debate. Then again, if you want to agree with my current type, you can post, too, but that's not as fun.

So, shoot.
Jack Flak
10-09-2008, 09:37 PM
INTJ sounds awesome.
CaptainChick
10-09-2008, 09:37 PM
You're an ENFP.
Haphazard
10-09-2008, 09:41 PM
You're an ENFP.

Support this.
Orangey
10-09-2008, 09:46 PM
You're fairly laconic- so INTJ.
Metamorphosis
10-09-2008, 09:56 PM
Support this.

lol, INTJ
CaptainChick
10-09-2008, 10:05 PM
Support this.
A.) You're full of :wubbie: and :heart:

B.) You just love to :hug:

C.) You're just soooooo cheerful!! :static:

D.) Your effusive enthusiasm! :yay:

E.) Your effusive enthusiasm, (banana-style)! :banana: :banana2:

F.) And your propensity to be a bit over-emotional at times. :boohoo:
Haphazard
10-09-2008, 10:07 PM
*passes out from emoticon overload*
CaptainChick
10-09-2008, 10:16 PM
*passes out from emoticon overload*
You're an INTJ, sister!

Face this fact, or else...

Or else, THIS!!!

:azdaja:

:azdaja:

:azdaja:

:azdaja:
Silently Honest
10-09-2008, 10:21 PM
Why bother asking anymore?
ygolo
10-09-2008, 10:29 PM
INTJ.

I and T are clear due to belief of not being able to identify with others.

Chart-the-Course focus on future, directive-reactive style is also clear...As is the NT desire for competence (or could be SP skill acquisition).

So INTJ, ISTP, or INTP with some Chart-the-Course interaction style.

Style of observation and analysis indicates a more Ni style than Ti style, and a preference for abstraction language.

So INTJ with a slight chance of IxTP.

In my perception, for your particular case, the more N you are, the more likely you are a J, and vice versa.
Jeffster
10-10-2008, 02:43 AM
I refuse to, because you didn't post in my analylyzlaualazuation thread. :steam:
Haphazard
10-10-2008, 02:50 AM
I refuse to, because you didn't post in my analylyzlaualazuation thread. :steam:

Well, I didn't post because I don't know how to analylyzlaualazuaize. I didn't want to make an idiot of myself.
Jeffster
10-10-2008, 02:54 AM
Well, I didn't post because I don't know how to analylyzlaualazuaize. I didn't want to make an idiot of myself.

Making an idiot out of yourself is one of the most fun things to do, though.
Hmm
10-10-2008, 03:36 AM
INtJ
Trinity
10-10-2008, 03:47 AM
I hate to disappoint you when you want an argument so I'll say ISFJ with no theory to back it up in an attempt to get a rise out of you :)
Haphazard
10-10-2008, 03:49 AM
I hate to disappoint you when you want an argument so I'll say ISFJ with no theory to back it up in an attempt to get a rise out of you :)

I want a debate, not an argument.

*ignores*
Trinity
10-10-2008, 03:53 AM
BUT I WANNA ARGUE!

And I don't doubt your INTJness.
Haphazard
10-10-2008, 03:55 AM
BUT I WANNA ARGUE!

No support, no argue.
Haphazard
10-12-2008, 01:54 AM
In my perception, for your particular case, the more N you are, the more likely you are a J, and vice versa.

Very interesting.

I think there are actually some people who would agree with you on this one.
Haphazard
10-16-2008, 12:17 PM
Oh yeah, I think I remembered why I started this thread.

My presence is too disarming for me to be an INTJ.
Jeffster
10-16-2008, 01:24 PM
My presence is too disarming for me to be an INTJ.

O RLY? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQtLoJlQD6E)
Ishida
10-18-2008, 09:04 AM
*passes out from emoticon overload*
Same reaction as me, must be INTJ..