PETA Asks Ben & Jerry's to go breast because it's best!!

[BerberElla]

The Breast Is Best! PETA Asks Ben & Jerry's to Dump Dairy and Go With Human Milk Instead

September 23, 2008


Burlington, Vt. - This morning, PETA dispatched a letter to Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, cofounders of ice cream icon Ben & Jerry's Homemade Inc., urging them to replace the cow's milk in their products with human breast milk. PETA's request comes in the wake of news reports that a Swiss restaurant owner will begin purchasing breast milk from nursing mothers and substituting breast milk for 75 percent of the cow's milk in the food he serves. PETA points out to Cohen and Greenfield that such a move on their part would lessen the suffering of dairy cows and their babies on factory farms and benefit human health at the same time.


"The fact that human adults consume huge quantities of dairy products made from milk that was meant for a baby cow just doesn't make sense," says PETA Executive Vice President Tracy Reiman. "Everyone knows that 'the breast is best,' so Ben & Jerry's could do consumers and cows a big favor by making the switch to breast milk."

PETA Media Center > Recent News Releases : The Breast Is Best! PETA Asks Ben & Jerry's to Dump Dairy and Go With Human Milk Instead (http://www.peta.org/mc/NewsItem.asp?id=11993)

Not sure about you but once in my life was enough. :shock:

[BerberElla]

The best I can think of is "Ben and Jerry's rasperry nipple" as a name, someone do better, I know it can be done.

[Negative_]

they're stealing my ideas!

:boohoo:

[Grayscale]

...and PETA shows once again that they love animals more than people. :dry:

it's narrow minded to think cow milk = cow babies, considering there have been many generations of healthy cows since the concept of milking them for our own consumption.

along these lines, should we be giving the milk to the adult cows? :doh:

go fuck a goat and be over with it, PETA


http://images.southparkstudios.com/media/images/808/808_img_13.jpg

[Enyo]

The best I can think of is "Ben and Jerry's rasperry nipple" as a name, someone do better, I know it can be done.

Ben and Jerry's Apricot Areola?

Ben and Jerry's Mammary Mocha?

Either way, it's gross. And it's another sign that PETA is absolutely bat shit crazy.

[ajblaise]

Either way, it's gross. And it's another sign that PETA is absolutely bat shit crazy.

Crazy..but harmless. You'd think PETA controlled a small army the way people rag on them.

They get hated on more than NAMBLA.

[SaltyWench]

The best I can think of is "Ben and Jerry's rasperry nipple" as a name, someone do better, I know it can be done.

O M G! LOL!

[Lateralus]

Crazy..but harmless. You'd think PETA controlled a small army the way people rag on them.

They get hated on more than NAMBLA.
Only because they get so many headlines, which is their own fault.

[ajblaise]

Only because they get so many headlines, which is their own fault.

It's not simply that, it's because they run contrary to and "threaten" the red-blood meat eating American way of life. It's like that "gay agenda" that everyone is so scared of.

When I hear stories of people throwing pigs blood on a businessmen that hurt animals and stuff like that, I just think "heh that's kind of funny".

[Jack Flak]

*eats huge club sandwich* I know exactly what you mean, aj. *nom nom*

[Lateralus]

It's not simply that, it's because they run contrary to and "threaten" the red-blood meat eating American way of life. It's like that "gay agenda" that everyone is so scared of.

When I hear stories of people throwing pigs blood on businessmen and stuff like that, I just think "heh that's kind of funny".
I think I get it. PETA is left-wing, so they're crucified. NAMBLA is right-wing (at least in your head), so they're left alone. I read you loud and clear, ajblaise.

[ajblaise]

I think I get it. PETA is left-wing, so they're crucified. NAMBLA is right-wing (at least in your head), so they're left alone. I read you loud and clear, ajblaise.

uhhhh not really what I had in mind Lat. The KKK receives plenty of hate for example, but for a different reason.

[Lateralus]

You're not making sense.

[ajblaise]

Explain. I don't think you're making sense. You haven't even made a real point yet.

[Lateralus]

I don't know why I bother...

I made the point, PETA gets so much hate because they make headlines. NAMBLA doesn't, so they get less hate. They're not on the radar.

Your response was, "No, headlines don't have anything to do with it. PETA is persecuted because they go against the desires of society". You must be implying that NAMBLA reinforces the values of society, otherwise your argument makes no sense.

[ajblaise]

I don't know why I bother...

I made the point, PETA gets so much hate because they make headlines. NAMBLA doesn't, so they get less hate. They're not on the radar.

Just the simple fact that a group gets headlines doesn't make them hated (obviously), it's what the group stands for that makes them hated.. headlines just pass on this info.

Your response was, "No, headlines don't have anything to do with it. PETA is persecuted because they go against the desires of society". You must be implying that NAMBLA reinforces the values of society, otherwise your argument makes no sense.

I'm not implying anything about NAMBLA. You're seeing this in black and white.


oh man, FJ's....it's hard to talk sense to them sometimes.

[pure_mercury]

It's not simply that, it's because they run contrary to and "threaten" the red-blood meat eating American way of life. It's like that "gay agenda" that everyone is so scared of.

When I hear stories of people throwing pigs blood on a businessmen that hurt animals and stuff like that, I just think "heh that's kind of funny".

They do it to celebrities who wear leather and fur, too, and it's not funny. It's assault. As I've stated before on these boards, if one of those people ever threw red paint or animal blood on my fur coat (if I had one, which I would love), the ensuing carnage would make a slaughterhouse look kindergarten fingerpaint.

[Enyo]

Just the simple fact that a group gets headlines doesn't make them hated (obviously), it's what the group stands for that makes them hated.. headlines just pass on this info.



I'm not implying anything about NAMBLA. You're seeing this in black and white.


oh man, FJ's....it's hard to talk sense to them sometimes.

Okay, I'm confused. Then what was the point of bringing up NAMBLA?

[pure_mercury]

Oh, and NAMBLA is pretty creepy, too. They are also vilified by just about everyone.

[ajblaise]

They do it to celebrities who wear leather and fur, too, and it's not funny. It's assault.

It's funny to me. I love reading news stories about stuff like that.

Not saying I wouldn't flip if they did it to me though...

[ajblaise]

Okay, I'm confused. Then what was the point of bringing up NAMBLA?

Because they are a group of pedophiles, and PETA is just a group of wacky animal lovers.. yet they get more hate.

[pure_mercury]

It's funny to me. I love reading news stories about stuff like that.

Not saying I wouldn't flip if they did it to me though...

I am glad assault and destruction of private property is funny to you.

[pure_mercury]

Because they are a group of pedophiles, and PETA is just a group of wacky animal lovers.. yet they get more hate.

Some of their members are extremists. I am not comparing them to NAMBLA, but you're glossing over the fact that there are some real maniacs amongst PETA.

[ajblaise]

Oh, and NAMBLA is pretty creepy, too. They are also vilified by just about everyone.

Yeah, that's a given. But I've heard a lot more anti-PETA rants than anti-NAMBLA ones, if any.

[ajblaise]

Some of their members are extremists. I am not comparing them to NAMBLA, but you're glossing over the fact that there are some real maniacs amongst PETA.

Sure. Still, as we agree, not very comparable to organized pedophiles.

I am glad assault and destruction of private property is funny to you.

awww, poor millionaire celebrities, my heart goes out to them.

[Jack Flak]

Already explained:

I don't know why I bother...

I made the point, PETA gets so much hate because they make headlines. NAMBLA doesn't, so they get less hate. They're not on the radar.

Your response was, "No, headlines don't have anything to do with it. PETA is persecuted because they go against the desires of society". You must be implying that NAMBLA reinforces the values of society, otherwise your argument makes no sense.

[Enyo]

Because they are a group of pedophiles, and PETA is just a group of wacky animal lovers.. yet they get more hate.

I know what NAMBLA is. I'm sure every time NAMBLA puts out a press release, they get crucified, too.

Oh, wait. I don't see press releases suggesting stupid, sick, or bizarre things in furtherance of their cause. I only see that from PETA.

I wouldn't say that PETA gets more hate than a group of pedophiles. I would say that PETA spends more time putting a target sign on themselves. Their campaign to get other people to think like them is so extreme that they've made themselves repulsive or a joke. Or both.

But I'm pretty sure there will be people with pitchforks and burnings of effigies at the next NAMBLA rally that makes its way to CNN.

[pure_mercury]

Awww, poor millionaire celebrities, my heart goes out to them.

Comments like this one are how it's clear you are a jerk IRL.

[ajblaise]

Already explained:

That argument would only make sense if PETA and NAMBLA were comparable groups. PETA is more benign, 100x more benign than NAMBLA.

[ajblaise]

Comments like this one are how it's clear you are a jerk IRL.

Lighten up man. I think I'm a nice guy IRL.

[Jack Flak]

That argument would only make sense if PETA and NAMBLA were comparable groups. PETA is more benign, 100x more benign than NAMBLA.
The word "irrelevant" fits this occasion well.

[Enyo]

Yeah, that's a given. But I've heard a lot more anti-PETA rants than anti-NAMBLA ones, if any.

Do you hear anti-PETA rants just because someone is grumbling? Or do you hear them because PETA has attempted to throw themselves in the limelight?

I don't see the comparison to PETA and NAMBLA.

Seriously, it seems like the classic red herring.

[Enyo]

That argument would only make sense if PETA and NAMBLA were comparable groups. PETA is more benign, 100x more benign than NAMBLA.

Then what was the point of bringing NAMBLA into a PETA conversation?

[ajblaise]

The word "irrelevant" fits this occasion well.

Why should PETA get more hate only because they get more headlines than NAMBLA? No one has explained this yet.

[Enyo]

Lighten up man. I think I'm a nice guy IRL.

You're so nice that you find assault funny? I have a hard time finding amusement in that, myself.

[ajblaise]

Then what was the point of bringing NAMBLA into a PETA conversation?

Simply to put the anti-PETA sentiment in perspective.

[Jack Flak]

Why should PETA get more hate only because they get more headlines than NAMBLA? No one has explained this yet.
I don't think people want to play the fool by explaining something so obvious. I know I don't.

[pure_mercury]

Lighten up man. I think I'm a nice guy IRL.

Then why not act like it on here? It's not the first time you've been so callous about people wealthier than you or I are, and it's annoying. You have sympathy for assholes who throw paint at people, but none for some celebrity who is just trying to walk into a building unaccosted? That's called "being a biased, immature jerk." I'm going to call you on it.

[Enyo]

Why should PETA get more hate only because they get more headlines than NAMBLA? No one has explained this yet.

Because you're assuming that PETA gets more hate than NAMBLA. You hear about PETA rants whenever PETA brings it on themselves.

You hear about NAMBLA rants whenever NAMBLA pokes their head out of the perv closet.

PETA pops out more frequently than NAMBLA. You hear PETA rants more frequently.

In short, you're assuming that NAMBLA gets more love than PETA because you don't hear about them as much.

I might publicly state that I hate broccoli. I may rave about it. But just because you never hear me say that cauliflower makes me vomit doesn't mean that the thought isn't there.

[Enyo]

Simply to put the anti-PETA sentiment in perspective.

Still not seeing it. Still seeing the NAMBLA thing as a pointless thing to bring into the conversation.

[ajblaise]

You're so nice that you find assault funny? I have a hard time finding amusement in that, myself.

Who doesn't view news stories like PETA tossing blood on people as nice little entertaining reads?

I guess I just don't identify with celebrities getting their fur coats wet.

Sure, assault isn't justified concerning this, but it's not like they put people in life threatening harm, do they?

If a PETA person ran up and punched some business man who does tests on animals, or some fur wearing celebrity I wouldn't find it fu....well, maybe I would.

[ajblaise]

Still not seeing it. Still seeing the NAMBLA thing as a pointless thing to bring into the conversation.

On the surface, you don't see an animal activist group getting shit on more than a pedophile group a little odd? That's obviously why I brought it up.

[Enyo]

Who doesn't view news stories like PETA tossing blood on people as nice little entertaining reads?

I don't. It doesn't matter how rich or how famous someone is.

That you somehow find it appropriate to physically attack people with more money than you says more about you than it does about those who are assaulted.

And I have a really hard time with equating that standard of behavior to a "nice guy".

[Enyo]

On the surface, you don't see an animal activist group getting shit on more than a pedophile group a little odd? That's obviously why I brought it up.

And this is why it's been pointed out to you umpteen times that PETA gets made fun of because of the rampant stupidity of their efforts, which they gleefully make public in the form of press releases.

[ajblaise]

Then why not act like it on here? It's not the first time you've been so callous about people wealthier than you or I are, and it's annoying. You have sympathy for assholes who throw paint at people, but none for some celebrity who is just trying to walk into a building unaccosted? That's called "being a biased, immature jerk." I'm going to call you on it.

I have nothing against rich people, I'm going to be one in a few years. I'm just so removed from the whole PETA situation, that I find the amusement in their antics.

As for sympathy for paint-throwing assholes..not really, I don't identify or sympathize with either the paint thrower or the person getting paint thrown on them.

[ajblaise]

And this is why it's been pointed out to you umpteen times that PETA gets made fun of because of the rampant stupidity of their efforts, which they gleefully make public in the form of press releases.

Clay Aiken get's made fun of, there is actual hostility towards PETA.

[Jack Flak]

Clay Aiken get's made fun of, there is actual hostility towards PETA.
Clay Aiken is not a criminal activist organization though, important to remember that.

[lowtech redneck]

Why should PETA get more hate only because they get more headlines than NAMBLA? No one has explained this yet.

Why do neo-conservatives (purported or otherwise) and right-wing Christians recieve more hate than either? For that matter, I've heard more hate directed at Sarah Palin recently than at Nambla or PETA. Also, how is NAMBLA any less antithetical to the self-image of typical Americans than PETA is? We have repeatedly demonstrated our willingness to compromise cherished principles in order to protect children from pedophiles.

To more directly answer your question, headlines remind people of a hated group's existence, so you spend more time than you might otherwise hating on the group in question. The more time you spend hating something, the more likely you are to remember it, and the more likely that that hatred will expand beyond rational proportions.

[Firelie]

Not sure about you but once in my life was enough. :shock:

I am too lazy to re-post my thoughts on this subject since I already did it a few days ago, so here's a link! (http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/331706-post146.html)

[ajblaise]

I don't. It doesn't matter how rich or how famous someone is.

That you somehow find it appropriate to physically attack people with more money than you says more about you than it does about those who are assaulted.

And I have a really hard time with equating that standard of behavior to a "nice guy".

I don't find it appropriate at all. Quite inappropriate and unjustified actually. But I can't help what I find amusing.

You're a fan of South Park right, do you not laugh when they make fun of unfortunate people? Retards, starving kids in Africa, Romanians....

[ajblaise]

Why do neo-conservatives (purported or otherwise) and right-wing Christians recieve more hate than either? For that matter, I've heard more hate directed at Sarah Palin recently than at Nambla or PETA. Also, how is NAMBLA any less antithetical to the self-image of typical Americans than PETA is? We have repeatedly demonstrated our willingness to compromise cherished principles in order to protect children from pedophiles.

To more directly answer your question, headlines remind people of a hated group's existence, so you spend more time than you might otherwise hating on the group in question. The more time you spend hating something, the more likely you are to remember it, and the more likely that that hatred will expand beyond rational proportions.

I think it has to do with that whole "moral high ground" thing some Christians, mainly evangelists, have going on.

[Enyo]

I don't find it appropriate at all. Quite inappropriate and unjustified actually. But I can't help what I find amusing.

You're a fan of South Park right, do you not laugh when they make fun of unfortunate people? Retards, starving kids in Africa, Romanians....

Nope. I hate South Park, actually. *shrugs* It doesn't appeal to my sense of humor.

[ajblaise]

Clay Aiken is not a criminal activist organization though, important to remember that.

I'll be sure to lock my doors and hide in a corner next time I hear PETA is coming to town lol.

[Lateralus]

I don't find it appropriate at all. Quite inappropriate and unjustified actually. But I can't help what I find amusing.

You're a fan of South Park right, do you not laugh when they make fun of unfortunate people? Retards, starving kids in Africa, Romanians....
Yeah...I don't know if you realized this or not, but South Park isn't real. It's a satirical cartoon. You do realize the difference between a cartoon and assaulting a real person, right?

[ajblaise]

Nope. I hate South Park, actually. *shrugs* It doesn't appeal to my sense of humor.

Well... if just having a sardonic sense of humor makes me an asshole, so be it.

[ajblaise]

Yeah...I don't know if you realized this or not, but South Park isn't real. It's a satirical cartoon.

Lat, goddammit, you're a genius.

[Enyo]

Well... if just having a sardonic sense of humor makes me an asshole, so be it.

I didn't say that you're an asshole for liking South Park. I would say that I'm just odd for not liking it, really. *shrugs*

As Lat pointed out, South Park is fiction. Those are real people getting assaulted. I don't see the comparison.

[Lateralus]

Lat, goddammit, you're a genius.
That's not relevant. What matters is whether or not you understand the significance of the distinction.

[ajblaise]

That's not relevant. What matters is whether or not you understand the significance of the distinction.

I think you misunderstood that post. I simply wanted to find out if she found humor in dark matters.

[ajblaise]

As Lat pointed out, South Park is fiction. Those are real people getting assaulted. I don't see the comparison.

And SP makes fun of real people starving in Africa. I'm not comparing the two events concerning anything but sardonic humor.

[Enyo]

I think you misunderstood that post. I simply wanted to find out if she found humor in dark matters.

Sure. I appreciate a lot of satire. I just don't like SP because I find fart jokes to be a turn off. *shrugs* I don't enjoy toilet humor.

Just like I don't enjoy assault. (Not personally, but not for other people, either.)

[kyuuei]

fh'hk;fhkgfo Gross!!

I thought this was a joke from the title. Surely!, I thought, PETA + breast + ice cream cannot be what I think it is! I stand corrected, the thread was exactly as advertised.

How about we purify our own urine to drink too instead of taking water from the freshwater animals? Let's take it a step further, we'll just eat dead people instead of animals. Hell, lets feed people to animals!!1!2

Gross. Milking a cow is harmless, and they live a better life, in my opinion, than they would on their own in the "wild" where they'd be eaten in a savage way by nature. I'm not sucking on some random chick's tit-water just because some douche in a tye-dye shirt that hasn't showered in a month and doesn't pay their fucking taxes wants to see the cow roam magestically in the wild and shit all over my lawn.

I'm going to drink twice as much milk as I normally do all week now, and eat ice cream every night instead of once a week.

[CzeCze]

Crazy..but harmless. You'd think PETA controlled a small army the way people rag on them.

They get hated on more than NAMBLA.

Dood, they have MUCH better PR than NAMBLA. *MUCH*

Though both their 'zines are probably on the 'banned' list in most public libraries. LOL.

To me, this is obviously a "statement". Like whenn that US Senator proposed a bill to re-enact the mandatory draft. His point was that ALL sons of ALL parents -- including the wealthy, elite, and priveleged -- should be drafted. And that would cause a total change in war policy b/c elected officials have to think about their own family.

I don't think PETA takes this request (very) seriously nor do they think their request will be taken seriously. They probably WANT you to be 'grossed out' because in their minds, it makes a point. "Mammary milk" is gross and unecesssary, regardless of whether it comes from a human or other animal.

Those PETA folks are so good at guerilla marketing and PR though.

We could talk more about PETA, but I'll wait to see what others have to say.

[kyuuei]

I don't think PETA takes this request (very) seriously nor do they think their request will be taken seriously. They probably WANT you to be 'grossed out' because in their minds, it makes a point. "Mammary milk" is gross and unecesssary, regardless of whether it comes from a human or other animal.

Those PETA folks are so good at guerilla marketing and PR though.

We could talk more about PETA, but I'll wait to see what others have to say.

Hm.

You know, I didn't even think about it this way. (felt I should say I am NOT being sarcastic, since I'm in a hyper mood today. I really think that may be their underlining point.)

Only they FAILED. I still think cow milk rocks and was specifically manufactured and milked from cows for me, and mommy's milk is for babies. ^_^b scoreboard houston!

Hot dogs and sausage don't gross me out because of what they're made of, and milk doesn't either. It passes my A-Okay test and that's good enough for me. To compare Mother's Milk to Cow's Milk just does not compute in my brain.

[Jeffster]

I'm no fan of PETA but I would have no trouble eating ice cream made from human milk.

I might even have to go to work for Ben & Jerry's to work on the milking line. :D

[Grayscale]

i will never be able to look at a carton of ben and jerries the same again.

i hate you all. :sad:

[heart]

This would create a lot of jobs for real human beings, not so sure about the job satisfaction of being hooked up to a milking machine though.

[Enyo]

This would create a lot of jobs for real human beings, not so sure about the job satisfaction of being hooked up to a milking machine though.

*snark* That's one way to cut down on the recent job loss. Oh, hey, and it's also a huge boon for the women's libbers. This would be a job that only *we* could do!

Wow. As gross as this is, I'm somehow seeing economic potential, here.

[GZA]

If they can find enough willing human milk donors to displace the entire dairy industry, I would be so amazed and impressed that I would support it.

But that will never happen.

It would just be to weird to sit down with some milk you got from the local store and think "theres a pretty good change my friend's mom donated this milk".

But in all seriosuness, if it is harmful to cows, would it not be harmful to humans? I know thats the point that we are supposed to consider, it's just too bad no one cares about the well being of cows compared to women. And by too bad, I mean for PETA.

PETA and NAMBLA should form one supergroup, called the North American Man/Boy Love Association of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. That would make for some killer marketing.

[heart]

*snark* That's one way to cut down on the recent job loss. Oh, hey, and it's also a huge boon for the women's libbers. This would be a job that only *we* could do!

Wow. As gross as this is, I'm somehow seeing economic potential, here.

Yes, HUGE economic potiential here (no pun intended btw) but you know men could do the job if they took hormones to get bewbs, but the women could make organic women only companies that advertised "no artificial hormones" until the men's companies took them to court to sue and say they couldn't advertise that "No artificial hormones" saying it implied that artificial hormones were somehow harmful (As has happened now with Monsanto and the organic milk companies :()

[millerm277]

I don't think PETA takes this request (very) seriously nor do they think their request will be taken seriously. They probably WANT you to be 'grossed out' because in their minds, it makes a point. "Mammary milk" is gross and unecesssary, regardless of whether it comes from a human or other animal.

They failed. Tonight for dinner I had: 22oz of nice NY Strip steak, 2 glasses of milk, and a giant bowl of ice cream, and I don't feel bad at all. In fact, maybe I'll go hunting tomorrow. :devil:

[Enyo]

They failed. Tonight for dinner I had: 22oz of nice NY Strip steak, 2 glasses of milk, and a giant bowl of ice cream, and I don't feel bad at all. In fact, maybe I'll go hunting tomorrow. :devil:

22 oz? Holy Christ, I couldn't eat that much. However, about 6 oz of steak, cooked with a bit of salt, pepper and garlic, along with green beans (cooked with bacon) and mashed potatoes (with butter, salt, and garlic) would be perfect.

However, I don't hunt. :P I'm against gun control, but I don't like guns.

[kyuuei]

... I could see a man definitely trying to launch this idea. "..Dudes. Look. If we can convince them of this.. We won't need machinery. *We* could milk them. It's for the animals! I swear! >.>.. Yeah, go PETA...!"

[Hmm]

YouTube - Muppets The Swedish Chef makes Squirrel Stew


YouTube - Swedish Chef and lobsters

[Ivy]

Dood, they have MUCH better PR than NAMBLA. *MUCH*

Though both their 'zines are probably on the 'banned' list in most public libraries. LOL.

To me, this is obviously a "statement". Like whenn that US Senator proposed a bill to re-enact the mandatory draft. His point was that ALL sons of ALL parents -- including the wealthy, elite, and priveleged -- should be drafted. And that would cause a total change in war policy b/c elected officials have to think about their own family.

I don't think PETA takes this request (very) seriously nor do they think their request will be taken seriously. They probably WANT you to be 'grossed out' because in their minds, it makes a point. "Mammary milk" is gross and unecesssary, regardless of whether it comes from a human or other animal.

Those PETA folks are so good at guerilla marketing and PR though.

We could talk more about PETA, but I'll wait to see what others have to say.

I'm alarmed that it took 63 posts for anyone to reach this conclusion. :D

And I also liked the direction this thread took at INTPC better. A lot better.

[Jack Flak]

Oh, Ivy. Reaching a conclusion and saying "HEY! Check out this conclusion I made!" are not quite the same.

[Ivy]

No kidding. Evidently you and lateralus and ajblaise and pure_merc had hardons for each other and couldn't be arsed to say it out loud.

[Jack Flak]

No kidding. Evidently you and lateralus and ajblaise and pure_merc had hardons for each other and couldn't be arsed to say it out loud.
I actually thought everyone but ajblaise realized it wasn't a serious proposition, and he was enough trouble already.

[ajblaise]

No kidding. Evidently you and lateralus and ajblaise and pure_merc had hardons for each other and couldn't be arsed to say it out loud.

I actually got propositioned by Lat and Merc in a PM, but eventually declined.

[Ivy]

Eventually. So you thought about it, huh? Can't say I blame you, they're sexy beasts.

[prplchknz]

Dood, they have MUCH better PR than NAMBLA. *MUCH*

Though both their 'zines are probably on the 'banned' list in most public libraries. LOL.

To me, this is obviously a "statement". Like whenn that US Senator proposed a bill to re-enact the mandatory draft. His point was that ALL sons of ALL parents -- including the wealthy, elite, and priveleged -- should be drafted. And that would cause a total change in war policy b/c elected officials have to think about their own family.

I don't think PETA takes this request (very) seriously nor do they think their request will be taken seriously. They probably WANT you to be 'grossed out' because in their minds, it makes a point. "Mammary milk" is gross and unecesssary, regardless of whether it comes from a human or other animal.

Those PETA folks are so good at guerilla marketing and PR though.

We could talk more about PETA, but I'll wait to see what others have to say.

I need to quit taking things so literally :doh:I was wondering if anyone belonging to PETA had volunteered their milk.

[ajblaise]

Eventually. So you thought about it, huh? Can't say I blame you, they're sexy beasts.

Lat was showing me videos of him in a nurse outfit with Merc riding piggy back screaming at the top of his lungs... hard to say no to that right away.

[Ivy]

You know, the term "piggyback" discriminates against our porcine equals. I'd advise you to avoid using it in the future.

[pure_mercury]

The last two pages of this thread are WAY more gross than eating human-milk ice cream, I can tell you that.

[Jack Flak]

The last two pages of this thread are WAY more gross than eating human-milk ice cream, I can tell you that.
This is scientifically true, because I would rather have the human milk product than read it again.