Roger Ebert

[dynamiteninja]

What is his type?

INFJ

[Jack Flak]

INFP, probably. I've read about 3,000 of his reviews, so I may think about this more.

[dynamiteninja]

INFP, probably. I've read about 3,000 of his reviews, so I may think about this more.

If he's INFP, he's a cranky one.

[Jack Flak]

If he's INFP, he's a cranky one.
Read his reviews of politically oriented movies. He seems to review them based on content, which goes against what he actually preaches about film, which seems very F-decision to me.

[dynamiteninja]

Read his reviews of politically oriented movies. He seems to review them based on content, which goes against what he actually preaches about film, which seems very F-decision to me.

OK, I'll go with INFP. Will edit OP

[GZA]

If he's INFP, he's a cranky one.
Yes, he does seem quite cranky. I was thinking some kind of NTJ, but then I remember his review of Into the Wild, where at the end, after actually reviewing the movie, he talked about his neighbor and childhood friend who, like the guy in the movie, had gone on a crazy journy only to be found dead in a battlefeild between central american revolutionary armies or something like that. It was all very emotional, really, it was like "I didn't just understand Chris McCandles by watching this movie, but I knew him my whole life".

With that in mind INFP seems more likely.

[ajblaise]

INFJ

[Jack Flak]

always with the wrench in the works!

[dynamiteninja]

INFJ

Care to illustrate?

[ajblaise]

Care to illustrate?

I think we all agree on the INF part, which I think it's quite clear he is, so concerning P vs. J; no P could so diligently and anally watch and review movies as much as he does, strong work ethic. He's also extremely opinionated, which is basically his job to be.

Check out this INFJ description:

INFJs place great importance on having things orderly and systematic in their outer world. They put a lot of energy into identifying the best system for getting things done, and constantly define and re-define the priorities in their lives. On the other hand, NFJs operate within themselves on an intuitive basis which is entirely spontaneous. They know things intuitively, without being able to pinpoint why, and without detailed knowledge of the subject at hand. They are usually right, and they usually know it. Consequently, INFJs put a tremendous amount of faith into their instincts and intuitions.

Because the INFJ has such strong intuitive capabilities, they trust their own instincts above all else. This may result in an INFJ stubborness and tendency to ignore other people's opinions. They believe that they're right. On the other hand, INFJ is a perfectionist who doubts that they are living up to their full potential.

Portrait of an INFJ (http://www.personalitypage.com/INFJ.html)

[EffEmDoubleyou]

Another vote for INFJ. I've never voted in any of these "type a celebrity" threads, but Roger Ebert is very dear to me.

[Jack Flak]

I wouldn't be totally opposed to INFJ fwiw.

[dynamiteninja]

I concur

[Uberfuhrer]

I would have said ENFJ, myself.

But anyway, I lost respect for him after he slammed video games for not being art.

He also tends to like movies that take place or are filmed in Chicago.

[Royal Xavier]

I've seen some of his reviews on YouTube, and he seems like an INFJ to me. He sort of reminds me of my grandfather, whom I believe to be an INFJ.

[dynamiteninja]

How comes it that no celeb bar Princess Diana (INFP) ever seems to have taken the MBTI test, or if they have, they are keeping the results secret from the rest of us!

It could save much conjecture!

[Jack Flak]

They're too busy bathing in $100 bills to care what their personality types are.

[ajblaise]

Or, it's that most celebrities have the intellectual curiosity of a squirrel.

[Colors]

Or, you know, they don't tattoo their MBTI letters on their forehead. (But there's such a perfect spot for it next to their birth hour and Stanford-Benet score.)

Another vote for INFJ. (I love reading his reviews even though I frequently disagree with him about the quality of the movie.) He doesn't write about the movie so much as the experience of having seen the movie. He writes about the themes that core the movie or its central weakness- and his own experiences that tie into it and bring a richness to the experience.

Inferior reviewers put the movie through an up-down calculation machine.