PDA

View Full Version : Marijuana: Fights bacteria?


ajblaise
09-07-2008, 05:17 AM
It seems like I hear about a new medical benefit from marijuana every few months.

*takes a hit for health*

Marijuana Ingredient May Fight Bacteria

Article Tools Sponsored By
By HENRY FOUNTAIN
Published: September 5, 2008

Marijuana may be something of a wonder drug — though perhaps not in the way you might think.

Researchers in Italy and Britain have found that the main active ingredient in marijuana — tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC — and related compounds show promise as antibacterial agents, particularly against microbial strains that are already resistant to several classes of drugs.

It has been known for decades that Cannabis sativa has antibacterial properties. Experiments in the 1950s tested various marijuana preparations against skin and other infections, but researchers at the time had little understanding of marijuana’s chemical makeup.

The current research, by Giovanni Appendino of the University of the Eastern Piedmont and colleagues and published in The Journal of Natural Products, looked at the antibacterial activity of the five most common cannabinoids. All were found effective against several common multi-resistant bacterial strains, although, perhaps understandably, the researchers suggested that the nonpsychotropic cannabinoids might prove more promising for eventual use.

The researchers say they don’t know how the cannabinoids work, and whether they would be effective as systemic antibiotics would require much more research and trials. But the compounds may prove useful sooner as a topical agent against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, to prevent the microbes from colonizing on the skin.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/09/science/09obdrug.html?_r=1&ref=science&oref=slogin

Metamorphosis
09-07-2008, 05:31 AM
Good thing it's illegal. :nice:

Anja
09-07-2008, 05:37 AM
I'd check this against considerable research that points to marijuana as an immunosuppressant.

ajblaise
09-07-2008, 09:01 AM
I'd check this against considerable research that points to marijuana as an immunosuppressant.

I read about that study a while ago, they used extremely large doses of THC on animals, and even with that, there wasn't a large effect on the immune system.

FDG
09-07-2008, 10:43 AM
Piemonte in English is Piedmont? Bleah

pure_mercury
09-07-2008, 03:33 PM
I read about that study a while ago, they used extremely large doses of THC on animals, and even with that, there wasn't a large effect on the immune system.

Smoking anything is not good for you, but there are worse things than marijuana. The biggest negative side effect to me would be contentment with doing nothing all the time. Not everyone gets that, but many do.

Magic Poriferan
09-07-2008, 03:44 PM
It seems like I hear about a new medical benefit from marijuana every few months.

I assume most of them are hastily concluded bullshit. This pingpong match is ridiculous. People trade fabricated facts for and against marijuana back and forth. Everyone knows that the government has warped the truth about marijuana, but then a great deal of people that use it also seem to glorify the drug beyond any reasonable capacity.

My own understanding is that marijuana leans very mildly toward the "not good for you" side. Especially if taken by smoking, of course. I personally loath the effects of marijuana on people, but I suppose that's purely subjective.

Ivy
09-07-2008, 04:43 PM
The concept of inhaling burnt plant matter into one's lungs for health is pretty laughable. The chemical components of marijuana may have positive effects when isolated, sure. That does not translate into "smoking weed is good for you."

ajblaise
09-07-2008, 10:47 PM
Smoking anything is not good for you, but there are worse things than marijuana. The biggest negative side effect to me would be contentment with doing nothing all the time. Not everyone gets that, but many do.

I don't know, I think you've been watching too much South Park. I don't know anyone who smokes pot and "does nothing". They do what they were going to do anyways, except while high.

Maybe when I first started smoking, the high was so strong and new that I was content just analyzing it and doing nothing, that ended quick.

ajblaise
09-07-2008, 10:50 PM
I assume most of them are hastily concluded bullshit. This pingpong match is ridiculous. People trade fabricated facts for and against marijuana back and forth. Everyone knows that the government has warped the truth about marijuana, but then a great deal of people that use it also seem to glorify the drug beyond any reasonable capacity.

My own understanding is that marijuana leans very mildly toward the "not good for you" side. Especially if taken by smoking, of course. I personally loath the effects of marijuana on people, but I suppose that's purely subjective.

The people who use pot aren't the ones making these studies, I'm not sure what you're point is with that first paragraph. Government does the bullshit studies (or they will do good studies but now tell anyone about the results) and universities perform studies.

Smoking is bad, but when no one knows anyone who has gotten lung cancer, or anything equally bad, from smoking it, you begin to wonder just how bad it really is.

ajblaise
09-07-2008, 10:56 PM
The concept of inhaling burnt plant matter into one's lungs for health is pretty laughable. The chemical components of marijuana may have positive effects when isolated, sure. That does not translate into "smoking weed is good for you."

There are about 10 pretty cool positive effects that have shown to come from THC and cannabinoids, however more research is required to validate. All smoke is bad, but when those medical effects and the fact that it is a very enjoyable activity are combined....overall, it's a + for me.

But for instance, it would be even better for an AIDS patient who can't even hold down their lunch because of all their nausea inducing meds to use weed.