Sloan / Global 5 test

[Athenian200]

Big Five Personality Test (http://similarminds.com/bigfive.html)


Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||||||| 40%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 64%
Emotional Stability |||| 20%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 42%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 90%

Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were low which suggests you are very worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were very high which suggests you are extremely intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

Global 5: sloan RLOEI; sloan+ rLoe|I|; primary Inquisitive; R(60%)L(80%)O(64%)E(58%)I(90%)

[prplchknz]

Extroversion |||||| 28%
Orderliness |||||| 22%
Emotional Stability |||||||||| 40%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 52%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 54%
Accuracy:

The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:

Extroversion results were low which suggests you are very reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were low which suggests you are overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense too often of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were medium which suggests you are moderately kind natured, trusting, and helpful while still maintaining your own interests.

Inquisitiveness results were medium which suggests you are moderately intellectual, curious, and imaginative.

You scored as introverted and intellectually curious. I recently started a discussion forum for introverted intellectuals, if interested visit introspectives.org

Global 5: sloan RLUAI; sloan+ Rl|U|xi; primary Unstructured; R(72%)L(60%)U(78%)A(52%)I(54%)

Yeah, I'm a pretty unstructured person. I hate school not because I hate learning but because it's all based on schedules that I have to be at class a certain time well maybe I don't want to learn about history until tomorrow.

[targo]

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||||||||||| 58%
Orderliness |||| 12%
Emotional Stability |||| 14%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||||||| 86%
Inquisitiveness |||||| 22%
Accuracy:

The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:

Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were very low which suggests you are overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense too often of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were very low which suggests you are extremely worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were very high which suggests you are overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense too often of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were low which suggests you are overly small minded, traditional, and conventional at the expense too often of intellectual curiousity, possibility, and progress.



Global 5: sloan SLUAN; sloan+ sL|U|AN; primary Unstructured;
S(58%)L(86%)U(88%)A(86%)N(78%)

[Littlelostnf]

SIZE="1"]Domain/Facet........... Score
Extraversion...............48
Friendliness.............45
Gregariousness...........35
Assertiveness............44
Activity Level...........67
Excitement-Seeking.......25
Cheerfulness.............84
Your score on Extraversion is average, indicating you are neither a subdued loner nor a jovial chatterbox. You enjoy time with others but also time alone.
Extraversion Facets
• Friendliness. Your level of friendliness is average.
• Gregariousness. Your level of gregariousness is average.
• Assertiveness. Your level of assertiveness is average.
• Activity Level. Your activity level is high.
• Excitement-Seeking. Your level of excitement-seeking is low.
• Cheerfulness. Your level of positive emotions is high.
Agreeableness
Domain/Facet........... Score
Agreeableness..............67
Trust....................24
Morality.................76
Altruism.................80
Cooperation..............77
Modesty..................49
Sympathy.................65
Your high level of Agreeableness indicates a strong interest in others' needs and well-being. You are pleasant, sympathetic, and cooperative.
Agreeableness Facets
• Trust. Your level of trust is low.
• Morality. Your level of morality is high.
• Altruism. Your level of altruism is high.
• Cooperation. Your level of compliance is high.
• Modesty. Your level of modesty is average.
• Sympathy. Your level of tender-mindedness is average.
Conscientiousness
Conscientiousness concerns the way in which we control, regulate, and direct our impulses. Impulses are not inherently bad; occasionally time constraints require a snap decision, and acting on our first impulse can be an effective response. Also, in times of play rather than work, acting spontaneously and impulsively can be fun. Impulsive individuals can be seen by others as colorful, fun-to-be-with, and zany.
Nonetheless, acting on impulse can lead to trouble in a number of ways. Some impulses are antisocial. Uncontrolled antisocial acts not only harm other members of society, but also can result in retribution toward the perpetrator of such impulsive acts. Another problem with impulsive acts is that they often produce immediate rewards but undesirable, long-term consequences. Examples include excessive socializing that leads to being fired from one's job, hurling an insult that causes the breakup of an important relationship, or using pleasure-inducing drugs that eventually destroy one's health.
Impulsive behavior, even when not seriously destructive, diminishes a person's effectiveness in significant ways. Acting impulsively disallows contemplating alternative courses of action, some of which would have been wiser than the impulsive choice. Impulsivity also sidetracks people during projects that require organized sequences of steps or stages. Accomplishments of an impulsive person are therefore small, scattered, and inconsistent.
A hallmark of intelligence, what potentially separates human beings from earlier life forms, is the ability to think about future consequences before acting on an impulse. Intelligent activity involves contemplation of long-range goals, organizing and planning routes to these goals, and persisting toward one's goals in the face of short-lived impulses to the contrary. The idea that intelligence involves impulse control is nicely captured by the term prudence, an alternative label for the Conscientiousness domain. Prudent means both wise and cautious. Persons who score high on the Conscientiousness scale are, in fact, perceived by others as intelligent.
The benefits of high conscientiousness are obvious. Conscientious individuals avoid trouble and achieve high levels of success through purposeful planning and persistence. They are also positively regarded by others as intelligent and reliable. On the negative side, they can be compulsive perfectionists and workaholics. Furthermore, extremely conscientious individuals might be regarded as stuffy and boring. Unconscientious people may be criticized for their unreliability, lack of ambition, and failure to stay within the lines, but they will experience many short-lived pleasures and they will never be called stuffy.

Domain/Facet........... Score
Conscientiousness..........57
Self-Efficacy............80
Orderliness..............49
Dutifulness..............33
Achievement-Striving.....53
Self-Discipline..........34
Cautiousness.............80
Your score on Conscientiousness is average. This means you are reasonably reliable, organized, and self-controlled.
Conscientiousness Facets
• Self-Efficacy. Your level of self-efficacy is high.
• Orderliness. Your level of orderliness is average.
• Dutifulness. Your level of dutifulness is average.
• Achievement-Striving. Your level of achievement striving is average.
• Self-Discipline. Your level of self-discipline is average.
• Cautiousness. Your level of cautiousness is high.
Neuroticism
Freud originally used the term neurosis to describe a condition marked by mental distress, emotional suffering, and an inability to cope effectively with the normal demands of life. He suggested that everyone shows some signs of neurosis, but that we differ in our degree of suffering and our specific symptoms of distress. Today neuroticism refers to the tendency to experience negative feelings. Those who score high on Neuroticism may experience primarily one specific negative feeling such as anxiety, anger, or depression, but are likely to experience several of these emotions. People high in neuroticism are emotionally reactive. They respond emotionally to events that would not affect most people, and their reactions tend to be more intense than normal. They are more likely to interpret ordinary situations as threatening, and minor frustrations as hopelessly difficult. Their negative emotional reactions tend to persist for unusually long periods of time, which means they are often in a bad mood. These problems in emotional regulation can diminish a neurotic's ability to think clearly, make decisions, and cope effectively with stress.
At the other end of the scale, individuals who score low in neuroticism are less easily upset and are less emotionally reactive. They tend to be calm, emotionally stable, and free from persistent negative feelings. Freedom from negative feelings does not mean that low scorers experience a lot of positive feelings; frequency of positive emotions is a component of the Extraversion domain.

Domain/Facet........... Score
Neuroticism................27
Anxiety..................29
Anger....................17
Depression...............26
Self-Consciousness.......40
Immoderation.............59
Vulnerability............39
Your score on Neuroticism is low, indicating that you are exceptionally calm, composed and unflappable. You do not react with intense emotions, even to situations that most people would describe as stressful.
Neuroticism Facets
• Anxiety. Your level of anxiety is low.
• Anger. Your level of anger is low.
• Depression. Your level of depression is low.
• Self-Consciousness. Your level or self-consciousness is average.
• Immoderation. Your level of immoderation is average.
• Vulnerability. Your level of vulnerability is average.
Openness to Experience
Openness to Experience describes a dimension of cognitive style that distinguishes imaginative, creative people from down-to-earth, conventional people. Open people are intellectually curious, appreciative of art, and sensitive to beauty. They tend to be, compared to closed people, more aware of their feelings. They tend to think and act in individualistic and nonconforming ways. Intellectuals typically score high on Openness to Experience; consequently, this factor has also been called Culture or Intellect. Nonetheless, Intellect is probably best regarded as one aspect of openness to experience. Scores on Openness to Experience are only modestly related to years of education and scores on standard intelligent tests.
Another characteristic of the open cognitive style is a facility for thinking in symbols and abstractions far removed from concrete experience. Depending on the individual's specific intellectual abilities, this symbolic cognition may take the form of mathematical, logical, or geometric thinking, artistic and metaphorical use of language, music composition or performance, or one of the many visual or performing arts. People with low scores on openness to experience tend to have narrow, common interests. They prefer the plain, straightforward, and obvious over the complex, ambiguous, and subtle. They may regard the arts and sciences with suspicion, regarding these endeavors as abstruse or of no practical use. Closed people prefer familiarity over novelty; they are conservative and resistant to change.
Openness is often presented as healthier or more mature by psychologists, who are often themselves open to experience. However, open and closed styles of thinking are useful in different environments. The intellectual style of the open person may serve a professor well, but research has shown that closed thinking is related to superior job performance in police work, sales, and a number of service occupations.

Domain/Facet........... Score
Openness to experience.....93
Imagination..............95
Artistic Interests.......82
Emotionality.............92
Adventurousness..........84
Intellect................87
Liberalism...............39
Your score on Openness to Experience is high, indicating you enjoy novelty, variety, and change. You are curious, imaginative, and creative.
Openness Facets
• Imagination. Your level of imagination is high.
• Artistic Interests. Your level of artistic interests is high.
• Emotionality. Your level of emotionality is high.
• Adventurousness. Your level of adventurousness is high.
• Intellect. Your level of intellect is high.
• Liberalism. Your level of liberalism is average. [/SIZE]

[Uberfuhrer]

Extroversion |||||||||| 38%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||||| 78%
Emotional Stability |||||| 26%
Accommodation || 10%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 90%

Hardly a surprise, really.

[Bethy]

Extroversion |||||||||| 34%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 68%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 60%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 58%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 60%




Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.




Global 5: sloan RCOAI; sloan+ rc|O|ai; primary Organized; R(66%)C(60%)O(68%)A(58%)I(60%)

[htb]

Extroversion |||||||||||||||| 66%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 70%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 60%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 46%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||| 62%

Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were high which suggests you are overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were medium which suggests you are moderately kind natured, trusting, and helpful while still maintaining your own interests.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

Global 5: sloan SCOEI; sloan+ sc|O|ei; primary Organized; S(66%)C(60%)O(70%)E(54%)I(62%)

["?"]

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||||||||||| 52%
Orderliness |||||||||||||| 60%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 50%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 58%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 60%

Extroversion results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being assertive and social and being withdrawn and solitary.

Orderliness results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being calm and resilient and being anxious and reactive.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

[The Unknown Essence]

Extroversion || 10%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 46%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||||||| 82%
Accommodation || 10%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||| 80%


Extroversion results were very low which suggests you are extremely reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were high which suggests you are very relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were very low which suggests you are overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense too often of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

[Santtu]

Extroversion |||||||||||||| 54%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 46%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||| 70%
Accommodation |||| 16%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 88%

Extroversion results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being assertive and social and being withdrawn and solitary.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were high which suggests you are very relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were very low which suggests you are overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense too often of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were very high which suggests you are extremely intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

[Falcarius]

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||||||||| 50%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 44%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||| 62%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 42%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||| 74%


Extroversion results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being assertive and social and being withdrawn and solitary.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

XCUEI
xcue|I|
X(50%)C(62%)U(56%)E(58%)I(74%)

[CzeCze]

I just rediscovered this test and after having gotten more comfortablel and familiar with MBTI, I have to say I got more out of it. That is to say, I understand it. :) Actually, having MBTI as a ruler, it helps to be able to compare and contrast.

Extroversion |||||||||||||||||| 80%
Orderliness |||||||||| 36%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 58%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 48%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 60%

sloan SCUEI; sloan+ |S|xuei; primary Social; S(78%)C(52%)U(60%)E(60%)I(58%)

Do I think this is accurate? I'm not sure. I tend to play down how "nice and accomodating" I am because frankly I hate being so nice. :dry: So I took the Big 5 again with more questions in a word association format and I think I was more honest with my answers. Same outcome!

SCUEI makes me seem like a brazen fun-loving selfish bastard...me likely.:yes:

SCUEI
(3.3% of women; 5.3% of men)

Some of the below descriptors are funny. I think some are meant as 'flaws' perhaps that is why they illicit a laugh from me.

not afraid of doing the wrong things, does not value rules and regulations, prefers unpredictable to organized, does not accomplish work on time, needs to maintain high levels of excitement, out for own personal gain, not afraid to draw attention to self, more pleasure seeking than responsible, not bothered by disorder, retaliatory, thrives on the rush of risk taking, unpredictable, asks questions that nobody else does :yes: , often does not know what they are doing :yim_rolling_on_the_ , spontaneous, first to act, not easily hurt, not apprehensive about new encounters, does not readily admit mistakes, not a perfectionist, not apologetic, disorganized, socially comfortable, outgoing, calm in crisis, fearless, atheist/agnostic tendencies, good at getting people to have fun :woot:, opinionated :nono:, not easily moved to tears, sexually immodest :whistling:, adventurous, unconventional, aggressive :azdaja:, often late, high energy level, likes the spotlight, ambivalent about the needs of others :thinking:, worry free, acts without thinking or planning, bad at saving money, selfish

[CzeCze]

This (http://similarminds.com/global5/g5-jung.html)page has interesting info on correlations between test types

Apparently SCUEI is more correlative to ENTP, because well, it's less accomodating and more self-serving than ENFP. :dry: (Egocentric versus Accomodating)

Semi-Correlating Descriptions


Jung/MBTI/Kiersey Global 5
INFP RCUAI, RLUAI
INTP RCUEI, RLUEI
INFJ RCOAI, RLOAI
INTJ RCOEI, RLOEI
ISTJ RCOEN, RLOEN
ISFJ RCOAN, RLOAN
ISTP RCUEN, RLUEN
ISFP RCUAN, RLUAN
ENFP SCUAI, SLUAI
ENTP SCUEI, SLUEI
ENFJ SCOAI, SLOAI
ENTJ SCOEI, SLOEI
ESTJ SCOEN, SLOEN
ESFJ SCOAN, SLOAN
ESTP SCUEN, SLUEN
ESFP SCUAN, SLUAN

[Mort Belfry]

Jung/MBTI/Kiersey Global 5
INFP RCUAI, RLUAI
INTP RCUEI, RLUEI
INFJ RCOAI, RLOAI
INTJ RCOEI, RLOEI
ISTJ RCOEN, RLOEN
ISFJ RCOAN, RLOAN
ISTP RCUEN, RLUEN
ISFP RCUAN, RLUAN
ENFP SCUAI, SLUAI
ENTP SCUEI, SLUEI
ENFJ SCOAI, SLOAI
ENTJ SCOEI, SLOEI
ESTJ SCOEN, SLOEN
ESFJ SCOAN, SLOAN
ESTP SCUEN, SLUEN
ESFP SCUAN, SLUAN

So take out C and L which seem to have no bearing on MBTI type and you get sixteen four letter codes.

Something seems strangely familiar about that.





Perhaps an attic I must seek.

[Jen]

Big Five Test Results
Extroversion |||||||||||||| 60%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 66%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 42%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 48%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 52%



Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.
Orderliness results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.
Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.
Accommodation results were medium which suggests you are moderately kind natured, trusting, and helpful while still maintaining your own interests.
Inquisitiveness results were medium which suggests you are moderately intellectual, curious, and imaginative.

[alcea rosea]

Global 5: sloan SCUAN; sloan+ |S|cuxN;
primary Social; S(84%)C(62%)U(64%)A(52%)N(70%)

Extroversion results were very high which suggests you are overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense too often of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were medium which suggests you are moderately kind natured, trusting, and helpful while still maintaining your own interests.

Inquisitiveness results were low which suggests you are overly small minded, traditional, and conventional at the expense too often of intellectual curiousity, possibility, and progress.

Otherwise ok, but the N is a bit too high. I'm no way traditionalisr or conventional. I'm more like SCUAI probably.

[whatever]

Extroversion |||||||||||||||||||| 88%
Orderliness |||||| 30%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||||||| 84%
Accommodation |||||||||| 40%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||| 44%

SCUEN
|S|CUen
S(88%)C(84%)U(70%)E(60%)N(56%)

:dry: I would have scored higher on inquisitive if they hadn't used science for all of the examples :( I LIKE social sciences, but anything involving math- you can count me out :tongue:

The type description they gave for SCUEN was unpleasantly accurate though :sad:

[disregard]

Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were high which suggests you are very relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were low which suggests you are overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense too often of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

scuei, egocentric :laugh:

[Uberfuhrer]

Well, since CzeCze likes robbing graves just like I do, I figured I could also relive memory lane. So I decided to take this silly ol' thing again!


Extroversion |||||| 22%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||||| 72%
Emotional Stability |||||| 24%
Accommodation |||| 12%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 90%


Extroversion results were low which suggests you are very reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were high which suggests you are overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were low which suggests you are very worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were very low which suggests you are overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense too often of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were very high which suggests you are extremely intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.


Global 5: sloan RLOEI (http://similarminds.com/global5/rloei.html); sloan+ RLOE|I|; primary Inquisitive (http://cityculture.org/global5/inquisitive.html); R(78%)L(76%)O(72%)E(88%)I(90%)

[scantilyclad]

Extroversion |||||| 28%
Orderliness |||||| 24%
Emotional Stability |||||||||| 40%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||| 64%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 54%
Accuracy:

Extroversion results were low which suggests you are very reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were low which suggests you are overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense too often of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were medium which suggests you are moderately intellectual, curious, and imaginative.


Global 5: sloan RLUAI; sloan+ Rl|U|ai; primary Unstructured; R(72%)L(60%)U(76%)A(64%)I(54%)

[cafe]

Extroversion |||||| 30%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 44%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 48%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 56%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||| 62%

Extroversion results were low which suggests you are very reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being calm and resilient and being anxious and reactive.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

[Uberfuhrer]

So exactly what is the definition of "complex"? I am, of course, referring to the question "I enjoy complex ideas." (Or something like that.)

I'm sure to some people, Bruckheimer movies, soap opera, and Go Dog Go are highly complex from an idea standpoint.

[sassafrassquatch]

Extroversion || 10%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||||| 78%
Emotional Stability |||||||||| 38%
Accommodation |||| 18%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 54%

Global 5: sloan RLOEI; sloan+ |R|lOEi; primary Reserved; R(90%)L(62%)O(78%)E(82%)I(54%)

Extroversion results were very low which suggests you are extremely reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were high which suggests you are overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were low which suggests you are overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense too often of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were medium which suggests you are moderately intellectual, curious, and imaginative.

[JustDave]

Extroversion |||||||||||||| 58%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||||| 78%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 54%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 50%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 60%
Accuracy:

The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:

Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were high which suggests you are overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being calm and resilient and being anxious and reactive.

Accommodation results were medium which suggests you are moderately kind natured, trusting, and helpful while still maintaining your own interests.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

Very accurate except for the last line. Overall I am more practical than theoretical.

[ygolo]

I thought I had posted my results earlier.

Extroversion |||||||||| 34%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 46%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 44%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 54%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 82%

Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were medium which suggests you are moderately kind natured, trusting, and helpful while still maintaining your own interests.

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

You scored as introverted and intellectually curious. I recently started a discussion forum for introverted intellectuals, if interested visit introspectives.org

Global 5: sloan RLUAI; sloan+ rlua|I|; primary Inquisitive; R(66%)L(56%)U(54%)A(54%)I(82%)

[Uberfuhrer]

So what I'm seeing is that those with an NT combination are generally scoring Very High on Inquisitiveness. While those with an ST and NF combination generally score Medium to Medium High.

It is true that I restructured the questions in my head to make them more global. Such as the question about finding theoretical physics interesting, because I think that all of these questions should be more vaguely worded so the general principle is more clear. I felt the question should have been more like "I like to ponder the mysteries of the world" or something like that, to make it correlate better to N, regardless of an F preference. By wording it as theoretical physics, it's just too NT.

I am personally not heavily interested in science (at least not from a data collection standpoint), but I do enjoy pondering the elusive side of anything unknown.

[JustDave]

So what I'm seeing is that those with an NT combination are generally scoring Very High on Inquisitiveness. While those with an ST and NF combination generally score Medium to Medium High.

It is true that I restructured the questions in my head to make them more global. Such as the question about finding theoretical physics interesting, because I think that all of these questions should be more vaguely worded to appeal to everyone. I felt the question should have been more like "I like to ponder the mysteries of the world" or something like that, to make it correlate better to N, regardless of an F preference. By wording it as theoretical physics, it's just too NT.

Why do they associate inquisitiveness with intellectualism? That's seems a bit narrow minded as I know many curious people, myself included, that are fascinated by practical things but have little interest in say quantum physics ...

[Uberfuhrer]

Why do they associate inquisitiveness with intellectualism? That's seems a bit narrow minded as I know many curious people, myself included, that are fascinated by practical things but have little interest in say quantum physics ...

I agree. In terms of MBTI, I think curiosity and inquisitiveness is common in every type, but what distinguishes S from N curiosity is the level of practicality and the concreteness of the subject.

Also, curiosity decreases with age, but theoretically, a person's true type remains the same.

EDIT: The FFM sometimes labels Inquisitiveness as Openness to Experience or Open-Mindedness, correlating it to N, but SPs are said to be very open-minded to new experiences, while NJs are often closed-minded and stubborn. So it becomes clear that the Open-Mindedness vs. Narrow-Mindedness in the FFM correlates to P vs. J, as well.

I would say that when correlating the FFM Openness dichotomy with the MBTI, NPs would score High Openness, SPs and NJs would be closer to Medium or Medium-High Openness, and the SJs would score on Low Openness. In the case of SP and NJ, SP would likely score higher in the Adventurousness and Aesthetic Interests subfactors, while NJ would score higher on Imaginative and Intellectual (which covers playfulness of ideas) subfactor. Ts will also probably score higher in the Intellectual subfactor. I would also suspect that an F preference could also score lower on Openness because they can often be closed-minded, since they tend to live by values and are less willing to change them.

EDIT: And I almost forgot, the FFM Openness factor also slightly correlates to F because it covers the Emotionality subfactor.

[cascademn]

Extroversion |||||| 26%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 68%
Emotional Stability |||||||||| 40%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 46%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||| 62%

Extroversion results were low which suggests you are very reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were medium which suggests you are moderately kind natured, trusting, and helpful while still maintaining your own interests.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

You scored as introverted and intellectually curious.

Global 5: sloan RLOEI; sloan+ |R|lOei; primary Reserved; R(74%)L(60%)O(68%)E(54%)I(62%)

[whatever]

:cry: I personally think that there's a bias to the test- I'm not incurious- I ask a lot of questions and am fascinated by different languages and cultures and such, I just don't really like philosophy or anything involving math! :boohoo:

It seems rather unfair to say that a person isn't inquisitive just because they aren't interested in those specific pursuits :steam:

[JustDave]

:cry: I personally think that there's a bias to the test- I'm not incurious- I ask a lot of questions and am fascinated by different languages and cultures and such, I just don't really like philosophy or anything involving math! :boohoo:

It seems rather unfair to say that a person isn't inquisitive just because they aren't interested in those specific pursuits :steam:

Precisely.

[Uberfuhrer]

:cry: I personally think that there's a bias to the test- I'm not incurious- I ask a lot of questions and am fascinated by different languages and cultures and such, I just don't really like philosophy or anything involving math! :boohoo:

It seems rather unfair to say that a person isn't inquisitive just because they aren't interested in those specific pursuits :steam:

To be fair, I don't think N's are necessarily interested in philosophy, either. I have my own personal philosophical beliefs, but I don't see why I should care about the beliefs of people who have long since been dead, or even whether I share the beliefs of those persons. Really, what's the point of reading the beliefs of another if you share similar beliefs?

With that said, I think the Big 5 is horribly biased, also, far more biased than the MBTI. In fact, I think it's the Big 5's correlation with the MBTI (even though the Inquisitiveness/Openness is not that correlated to S/N) that creates a bias in the MBTI community.

And I truthfully don't think any type is truly open-minded or willing to change, because it's natural to fear the unknown. In fact, I would suspect that people who think are the ones more likely to fear the unknown.

[JustDave]

To be fair, I don't think N's are necessarily interested in philosophy, either. I have my own personal philosophical beliefs, but I don't see why I should care about the beliefs of people who have long since been dead, or even whether I share the beliefs of those persons. Really, what's the point of reading the beliefs of another if you share similar beliefs?

With that said, I think the Big 5 is horribly biased, also, far more biased than the MBTI. In fact, I think it's the Big 5's correlation with the MBTI (even though the Inquisitiveness/Openness is not that correlated to S/N) that creates a bias in the MBTI community.

And I truthfully don't think any type is truly open-minded or willing to change, because it's natural to fear the unknown. In fact, I would suspect that people who think are the ones more likely to fear the unknown.

You raised a good point which brings me to the following: Is it me, or do those that are strongly intellectual seem to have more phobias than the average person?

[Uberfuhrer]

You raised a good point which brings me to the following: Is it me, or do those that are strongly intellectual seem to have more phobias than the average person?

Yes! And I also think that an N is more likely to be diagnosed with psychiatric disorders and/or have a break from reality, Ns are also more likely to engage in magical thinking. Ns, by nature, aren't realists.

[JustDave]

Yes! And I also think that an N is more likely to be diagnosed with psychiatric disorders and/or have a break from reality, Ns are also more likely to engage in magical thinking. Ns, by nature, aren't realists.

Now that you mention it, I cannot recall any prolific scientists, inventors, authors, and other creative/intellectual types whose personalities could be considered "normal".

[whatever]

Sooo... the psych hospital is full of Ns and the jails are full of Ss? :huh:

[JustDave]

Sooo... the psych hospital is full of Ns and the jails are full of Ss? :huh:

Correct.

Except I would add that the psych hospitals are full of NPs and the prisons are full of SPs. My reason for this conclusion is, allegedly two characteristics of the perceiving preference are: Care-free & Spontaneous. (Judging or Perceiving Preference (http://www.mypersonality.info/personality-types/judging-perceiving/))

For some odd reason society frowns on the carefree and spontaneous ... :devil:

[Uberfuhrer]

Sooo... the psych hospital is full of Ns and the jails are full of Ss? :huh:

There's a good way of putting it.

NPs are at the psychiatric hospitals, NJs are reclusive hermits that everyone is intimidated by. SPs are in either jail or in the emergency room for getting themselves injured in some sort of reckless stunt. NJs also go to jail because they're megalomaniacs...and, I might add, they're probably the ones who get executed for their crimes! ;)

And the SJs, of course, are the do-gooders who get the moré or law breakers committed or sentenced!

[FallsPioneer]

Extroversion |||||||||||||| 56%
Orderliness |||||||||||||| 54%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 60%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 56%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||| 50%


Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were medium which suggests you are moderately intellectual, curious, and imaginative.

[aeon]

Extroversion 34%
Orderliness 46%
Emotional Stability 78%
Accommodation 56%
Inquisitiveness 70%

Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were high which suggests you are very relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

Global 5: sloan RCUAI; sloan+ r|C|uaI; primary Calm; R(66%)C(78%)U(54%)A(56%)I(70%)

I bolded the items I identified with

avoidant, often late, patient, rarely prepared, non-aggressive, slow to judge others, withdrawn, unconcerned with image, relaxed, avoids crowds, easy going, not demanding, low maintenance, unambitious, not domineering, private, thinks before acting, concerned with the feelings of others, not wild and crazy, not controlling, does not like to show anger, hard to offend, dislikes the spotlight, uninterested in leading, not competitive, overly nice, not physically affectionate with most people, not bothered by disorder, level emotions, does not second guess self, agnostic/atheistic tendencies, not picky about food, not relationship obsessed, unproductive, unimposing, plain in appearance, disorganized, loner, lower energy level, very curious, uninterested in prestige/fame, not superficial, likes difficult reading material, does not get worked up about most things, fearless, flexible, trusting, does not stick to plans, easily distracted, interested in science, unconcerned that people have trouble reading them, a good loser, modest, not swayed by emotions


cheers,
Ian

[pure_mercury]

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||||||||||||||||| 90%
Orderliness |||||||||||||| 54%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 50%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 60%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||| 64%
Accuracy:

The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:

Extroversion results were very high which suggests you are overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense too often of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being calm and resilient and being anxious and reactive.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

Feel free to write your own self description (strengths and weaknesses) in the comment form below.

Global 5: sloan SLOAI; sloan+ |S|xoai; primary Social; S(90%)X(50%)O(54%)A(60%)I(64%)

open, organized, asks lots of questions, outgoing, prone to panic, easily hurt, narcissistic, detail oriented, concerned about others, the first to act, believes children need firm discipline, finish most things they start, comfortable around others, upset by the misfortunes of strangers, socially skilled, compliments others frequently, interested in people, busy, interested in the problems of others, tens, physically affectionate, overly nice, likes to lead, generous, in touch with feelings, not afraid to draw attention to self, manipulative, prone to jealousy, worrying, easily excited, motivated by a desire for acclaim, prone to addiction, frequently driven to impress others, passionate about causes, swayed by emotions, curious, anxious, passionate about bettering the world's condition, stressed, keeps spaces clean, believes in human goodness, well informed, thoughtful, assertive, fears doing the wrong thing, rushed

Social
more verbal than non verbal, spends more time in group activities than solitary activities, does not like to go long without speaking to anyone, loves night life activities and crowds, competes for the spotlight, fits in most places, trusting, self expressive, not the best listener, action oriented, if they had to live their life over again they would not change much, dresses to stand out, seductive, very sexual, does not fear getting involved with others, female extroverts like tight fitting clothing, have more desire than fear, enjoys leadership, brutally honest, more random than controlled, impulsive, optimistic, motivated, wants to be famous, exhibitionist tendencies

[zhandao]

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||| 30%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 48%
Emotional Stability |||||| 26%
Accommodation |||||||||| 36%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 58%
Accuracy:

The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:

Extroversion results were low which suggests you are very reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were low which suggests you are very worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

You scored as introverted and intellectually curious. I recently started a discussion forum for introverted intellectuals, if interested visit introspectives.org

Global 5: sloan RLUEI; sloan+ R|L|xei; primary Limbic; R(70%)L(74%)U(52%)E(64%)I(58%)

---

IMO better chart for correlation: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator#Correlations_to_other_instru ments)

Supports the conclusions on Similarminds but shows the degree of correlation.

[tovlo]

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||| 22%
Orderliness |||||||||||||| 52%
Emotional Stability |||||| 28%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||| 66%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||| 66%

Extroversion results were low which suggests you are very reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were low which suggests you are very worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.


Global 5: sloan RLOAI; sloan+ |R|Lxai; primary Reserved; R(78%)L(72%)O(52%)A(66%)I(66%)

[Ender]

Big Five Test Results sloan RCUAN; sloan+ |R|xUAn; primary Reserved; R(76%)X(50%)U(76%)A(76%)N(56%)

Extroversion (24%) low which suggests you are very reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Accommodation (76%) high which suggests you are overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense too often of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Orderliness (24%) low which suggests you are overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense too often of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability (50%) medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being calm and resilient and being anxious and reactive.

Inquisitiveness (44%) moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly small minded, traditional, and conventional at the expense of intellectual curiousity, possibility, and progress.


I think the inquisitiveness is kinda low for me.

[suzyk]

Extroversion |||| 16%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 64%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 46%
Accommodation |||||| 22%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||| 72%

Extroversion results were very low which suggests you are extremely reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being calm and resilient and being anxious and reactive.

Accommodation results were low which suggests you are overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense too often of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

Global 5: sloan RLOEI; sloan+ |R|loEI; primary Reserved; R(84%)L(54%)O(64%)E(78%)I(72%)

[Akari]

Extroversion |||| 14%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||||| 80%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 50%
Accommodation |||| 18%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 60%

I'm not that orderly...

Extroversion results were very low which suggests you are extremely reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were high which suggests you are overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being calm and resilient and being anxious and reactive.

Accommodation results were low which suggests you are overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense too often of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

Global 5: sloan RCOEI; sloan+ |R|xOEi; primary Reserved; R(86%)X(50%)O(80%)E(82%)I(60%)

[Zelath]

Extroversion |||| 16%
Orderliness |||||||||| 36%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 58%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 54%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 54%

Global 5: sloan RCUAI; sloan+ |R|cuai; primary Reserved; R(84%)C(58%)U(64%)A(54%)I(54%)

Eh, I liked aeon's idea for bolding the traits.
avoidant, often late, patient, rarely prepared, non-aggressive, slow to judge others, withdrawn, unconcerned with image, relaxed, avoids crowds, easy going, not demanding, low maintenance, unambitious, not domineering, private, thinks before acting, concerned with the feelings of others, not wild and crazy, not controlling, does not like to show anger, hard to offend, dislikes the spotlight, uninterested in leading, not competitive, overly nice, not physically affectionate with most people, not bothered by disorder, level emotions, does not second guess self, agnostic/atheistic tendencies, not picky about food, not relationship obsessed, unproductive, unimposing, plain in appearance, disorganized, loner, lower energy level, very curious, uninterested in prestige/fame, not superficial, likes difficult reading material, does not get worked up about most things, fearless, flexible, trusting, does not stick to plans, easily distracted, interested in science, unconcerned that people have trouble reading them, a good loser, modest, not swayed by emotions

[Antisocial one]

RCOEI

Extroversion |||| 14%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 66%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||||||| 90%
Accommodation |||| 18%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 90%

[Leysing]

Extroversion |||||||||| 32%
Orderliness |||||||||| 34%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 58%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||| 62%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||| 78%

Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

Global 5: sloan RCUAI; primary Inquisitive

[Sytpg]

Extroversion |||||||||||||||||||| 84%
Orderliness |||||| 22%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 60%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 54%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 56%

[frenchkiss]

Extroversion |||||| 28%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||||| 80%
Emotional Stability |||||| 28%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 60%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 58%

[Lithium]

Extroversion |||||||||||| 46%
Orderliness |||||||||| 38%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 60%
Accommodation |||||||||| 32%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||| 46%


Extroversion results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being assertive and social and being withdrawn and solitary.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were medium which suggests you are moderately intellectual, curious, and imaginative.

I did it quite quick, it sounds more or less right. If anything I'd say I'm less selfish than the result and more inquisitive.

[Kora]

Extroversion |||||||||| 36%
Orderliness |||||||||| 32%
Emotional Stability |||||||||| 36%
Accommodation |||||||||| 32%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||| 72%

RLUEI? Hm.

[dissonance]

Extroversion |||||||||||| 42%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 50%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||||| 72%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||||||| 82%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 88%

rCxA|I|

[sciski]

Extroversion |||||||||||||| 54%
Orderliness |||||||||| 38%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 54%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||| 62%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 60%

SCUAI--I'd say I swing between that and RCUAI.

[ajblaise]

Extroversion |||||||||||| 46%
Orderliness |||| 12%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||||||| 90%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 42%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 90%

Nice :cool:

[dissonance]

Holy crap I have the highest accommodation score on this thread! (Except Targo on the first page, but I haven't seen her in hella long :))

[ajblaise]

and I'm tied for the most emotionally stable. heh, you all fail at emotion.

[dissonance]

Yeah, that's probably a better trait to have, too.

(See how agreeable I am? LOL)

[ajblaise]

hey, well.. at least you'd probably be better at opening a hotel.

[entropie]

martyr complex ? OMFG
----
Extroversion |||||||||||| 46%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 44%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 44%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 58%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||| 66%
-
Extroversion results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being assertive and social and being withdrawn and solitary.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.
-
Global 5: sloan RLUAI; sloan+ rlua|i|; primary Inquisitive; R(54%)L(56%)U(56%)A(58%)I(66%)

[sciski]

hey, well.. at least you'd probably be better at opening a hotel.


And you can deal with the irate customers (and their horses)! Everybody wins! :D

[ajblaise]

I'm not sure where the horses come in..

[dissonance]

I dunno about the hotel. I am reserved...

How about being a therapist? I pwn you at that :)

[Bella]

I took this test yesterday and scored high on 'orderliness'. I didn't read the word right though and thought it said 'ordinariness'.

Didn't feel so good for about 7 seconds. :blush:

[Freya]

Extroversion |||||||||||||| 56%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 70%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 56%
Accommodation |||||||||| 40%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||| 50%

Global 5: sloan SCOEN; sloan+ sc|O|ex; primary Organized; S(56%)C(56%)O(70%)E(60%)X(50%)

I feel like that is a very good description of me!! I can understand being an "S" because my I and E in MBTI are very close.

[Bougal]

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||||||||||||||| 76%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 64%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||||| 76%
Accommodation |||||||||| 40%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||| 74%


The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:



Extroversion results were high which suggests you are overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense too often of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were high which suggests you are very relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

[Antisocial one]

Extroversion |||||| 24%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||||||| 86%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||||||| 82%
Accommodation |||| 18%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 90%

R(76%)
C(82%)
O(86%)
E(82%)
I(90%)

I think that my accommodation is the outcome of my extroversion.
But I am quite lovely person actually.;)

[ajblaise]

Extroversion |||| 14%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 66%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||||||| 90%
Accommodation |||| 18%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 90%

Extroversion |||||| 24%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||||||| 86%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||||||| 82%
Accommodation |||| 18%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 90%

You've grown less emotionally stable since a few weeks ago, what gives?

[colmena]

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||| 16%
Orderliness |||||| 26%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 46%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||||| 72%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 82%

Extroversion results were very low which suggests you are extremely reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were low which suggests you are overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense too often of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being calm and resilient and being anxious and reactive.

Accommodation results were high which suggests you are overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense too often of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

You scored as introverted and intellectually curious.

Global 5: sloan RLUAI; sloan+ |R|lUAI; primary Reserved; R(84%)L(54%)U(74%)A(72%)I(82%)

[Antisocial one]

You've grown less emotionally stable since a few weeks ago, what gives?

Well I had some exams last week that were be or not to be.
I turned out "to be".

My grandmother ended up in hospital for a short period so everybody else were on the edge.

Plus I am in the slight conflict with family since I want to live like hardcore J. What I actually am. When I discovered MBTI and that I am INTJ it
looked like that I am barely J but it turned out that I am actually very J person. Which is hidding since I live in environment that is quite P. That is why my orderliness got so big boost and that is why I have opened thread "How is it like to be P?".


So it turned that there was negative efect on me because of this reasons but dont worry I will survive. Give me some time to heal myself so that once again we we will be equal :)

[InaF3157]

Extroversion |||||||||| 38%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 42%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 46%
Accommodation |||||| 28%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||| 78%

Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being calm and resilient and being anxious and reactive.

Accommodation results were low which suggests you are overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense too often of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.
---
Global 5: sloan RLUEI; sloan+ rluE|I|; primary Inquisitive;
R(62%)
L(54%)
U(58%)
E(72%)
I(78%)

[Trinity]

RCuei R(78%)C(76%)U(58%)E(58%)I(60%)

Extroversion |||||| 22%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 42%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||||| 76%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 42%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 60%

Extroversion results were low which suggests you are very reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were high which suggests you are very relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

[Quixotic]

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||||||||| 44%
Orderliness |||||||||| 34%
Emotional Stability |||||||||| 36%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||| 64%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||| 80%
Accuracy:



Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.


....Sounds about right. haha.